Armed conflicts are among the most disruptive forces acting on agro-landscapes, yet their impact on land-use systems and ecosystem services remains insufficiently integrated into landscape ecology and agroecological research. This paper aims to systematise the international body of knowledge on the mechanisms of warinduced impacts on agro-landscapes, to identify reproducible causal patterns of ecosystem service degradation, and to propose methodological priorities for comprehensive assessment and monitoring of agro-landscapes under active armed conflict and post-conflict recovery. The study is based on a bibliometric analysis of 1,502 publications (WoS/Scopus, 2000–2026) and a comparative analysis of five literature clusters reflecting the evolution of research paradigms from foundational ecological concepts to conflict-specific environmental impact studies. The synthesis shows that conflicts disrupt agro-landscapes through direct destruction, forced displacement, land abandonment, and institutional collapse, triggering cascading degradation of provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural ecosystem services. Resilience theory and socio-ecological systems frameworks are identified as essential but systematically underutilised analytical lenses. A pronounced geographic bias favouring East Africa and Latin America was detected, with Eastern Europe and the Middle East comparatively understudied — a gap being rapidly addressed by the Ukrainian case post-2022. Remote sensing has emerged as the dominant methodology for assessing conflict-induced land-use change, yet integration with socio-economic and institutional dimensions remains limited. The paper argues that the next priority is the development of coupled models — Earth observation + field validation + ecological-economic assessment + scenario analysis — capable of underpinning evidence-based agro-landscape recovery policy under conditions of prolonged uncertainty.
Loading....